The Guthrie family released a second video on social media pleading for their mother’s return. Camron Guthrie, Savannah’s brother, is the only person in the 21-second video.
Camron addressed his mother’s possible abductors. “Whoever is out there holding our mother, we want to hear from you,” Guthrie said. “We haven’t heard anything directly. We need you to reach out, and we need a way to communicate with you so we can move forward. But first, we have to know that you have our mom.
We want to talk to you, and we are waiting for contact.” Nancy, who is the mother of “Today” show host Savannah Guthrie, was last seen on the night of Jan. 31 after being dropped off at her Catalina Foothills home in Tucson, AZ. Video Info CONTINUE READING
In early February 2026, a quiet stretch of Tucson’s Catalina Foothills became the center of a rapidly growing national search after 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie—mother of “Today” co-anchor Savannah Guthrie—was reported missing, setting off a fast-moving investigation involving the Pima County Sheriff’s Department and the FBI. From the beginning, investigators signaled they did not believe this was a typical walk-away missing-person case. Nancy’s health concerns were widely discussed by authorities and news outlets—she reportedly needs daily medication and has heart issues including a pacemaker—adding urgency to every hour she remained unaccounted for.
The night she vanished
According to reporting from major outlets, Nancy was last known to be at or near her home the night of January 31, 2026, after spending the evening with family. When she didn’t appear for church the next morning and could not be reached, concern escalated quickly, leading to a formal missing report on February 1. What investigators found at the scene only deepened alarm: multiple reports describe blood on the front porch later confirmed to be Nancy’s. That detail—combined with the absence of a clear voluntary reason for her to leave—pushed law enforcement toward the belief that she may have been taken against her will.
Surveillance footage and a “subject” of interest
As tips poured in, authorities began narrowing their focus to evidence captured on neighborhood and home security systems. Federal investigators released images and video that, according to multiple outlets, show a masked, gloved individual at Nancy’s front door and tampering with the door camera during the critical time window. In the same wave of updates, the FBI publicly described the person seen in the footage as a “potential subject,” including approximate height and build and a key identifying detail: a black “Ozark Trail” hiking backpack. Those images had an immediate effect. News accounts describe investigators being flooded with leads—thousands of tips arriving in a short span—while law enforcement continued canvassing the area and requesting residents check cameras from the two nights surrounding Nancy’s disappearance.
The family goes public: “Bring her home”
With the case expanding far beyond Tucson, Savannah Guthrie and her siblings turned to the public for help, posting emotional appeals that would soon become the most shared element of the story. One widely circulated family video—referenced in local and national coverage—features Savannah alongside her siblings speaking directly to whoever might have information or involvement, pleading for Nancy’s safe return and using a simple refrain: “Bring her home.” The Fox 10 Phoenix report notes the family framed their message as a response—“we received your message”—and begged for Nancy to be returned, emphasizing that peace for them depends on her coming home.
In the days that followed, Savannah also posted additional clips and throwback family video, underscoring both hope and determination. Outlets including CBS News and People described her sharing older footage of her mother while reiterating the family’s commitment not to stop searching. The social-media appeals weren’t only emotional; they were operational—directing the public to contact federal authorities with any information, amplifying the FBI tip line that investigators were actively monitoring.
Reward increases and a widening investigation
As the search moved into its second week, investigators signaled both urgency and scale. Reporting from The Washington Post described the FBI increasing the reward to $100,000 for information leading to Nancy’s discovery or an arrest. At the same time, authorities suggested more interviews and detentions could occur as they worked through an enormous volume of tips and tried to align witness accounts with video evidence. Some outlets reported that at least one person had been questioned and released earlier in the investigation; others described additional detentions being possible or underway, reflecting how fluid the inquiry remained.
A particularly significant development, cited by The Guardian, involved DNA evidence: investigators recovered DNA at the scene that reportedly did not match Nancy or close contacts, leaving an unknown profile that could become pivotal if matched to a suspect. The same reporting noted gloves and other items were sent for testing, while a public dispute emerged around how evidence was handled between local authorities and the FBI—an unusual but not unheard-of tension in complex, high-profile cases.
“Secretive” law-enforcement activity near the home
By February 14, 2026, major news organizations described a visible escalation on the ground. The Associated Press reported law enforcement blocked off a road near Nancy’s home while forensic units operated in the area, with officials being notably tight-lipped and pointing to FBI involvement as a reason for withholding detail. The Washington Post similarly reported a major operation late Friday near a residence close to Nancy’s home, again emphasizing that the investigation had entered a more intensive phase while authorities offered minimal public explanation. To families watching from the outside, these moments often look like turning points—signs that investigators may be acting on a fresh lead, a new piece of forensic information, or a tip that needs immediate follow-up. But officials cautioned that much of what they were doing could not be discussed publicly without risking the case.
The “ransom note” noise—and what investigators emphasized instead
The Associated Press also noted reports of alleged ransom notes sent to media outlets, though the same coverage stated that no demands had been met and investigators’ concerns remained centered on Nancy’s safety and the evidence suggesting she did not leave voluntarily. In high-profile disappearances, spurious claims and false leads often surge—something investigators must filter carefully. That’s why authorities kept returning to the concrete anchors of the case: confirmed blood evidence, surveillance imagery, forensics, and the ongoing effort to reconstruct a precise timeline from camera footage and tips.
What “Bring her home” represents
The phrase “Bring her home” became more than a caption—it turned into a rallying message that tied together the public narrative and the investigative effort. In the family’s video appeal (as described in local reporting), the Guthrie siblings spoke with a mix of controlled fear and raw urgency, directing their message at whoever might be holding Nancy or keeping her from returning. It is a form of communication families often resort to when conventional avenues feel too slow and when they hope that conscience, pressure, or the fear of consequences might move someone on the other side to act.
Meanwhile, investigators continued asking neighbors for security footage, a tactic that can be decisive in suburban areas where doorbell cameras can track vehicles, foot traffic, and unusual activity minute-by-minute. The goal is to stitch together a “movie” of the night—identifying where the subject came from, what direction they left, whether a vehicle was involved, and whether the person appeared in multiple camera angles that could reveal more distinctive features.
Where the case stood as of February 14, 2026
By mid-February, the public picture—drawn from law-enforcement statements and major news reporting—was this: Nancy Guthrie was missing under circumstances authorities found deeply concerning, evidence at her home suggested possible foul play, and surveillance footage showed a masked person tampering with her camera around the time she disappeared. The FBI and local investigators were pursuing a large volume of leads, had elevated the reward, and were conducting targeted operations near the home while staying guarded about details. The family, facing days of uncertainty, continued to post public appeals and personal videos—both to keep attention on the case and to push any person with information to come forward.
If you want, tell me whether you want this rewritten in your usual Facebook-drama storytelling style (hook + emotion + cliffhanger + light CTA, one paragraph, bold key phrases, emojis). I can convert this same verified timeline into that exact format.
